MacDailyNews Take: From what we’ve seen (and we’ve seen quite a few) the majority of these virtualization comparisons give the edge to Parallels Desktop over VMWare. Boot times are less and 3D graphics run faster.” “Having said that, I’ve found that Parallels Desktop 10 works faster on my Mac (a 2013 15-inch Retina MacBook Pro) than VMWare Fusion 7 does. What’s more, both vendors make trial versions available for download, so I heartily encourage anyone interested in giving them a try to do so. Parallels se lleva los puntos en este caso, cualquier programa que uses sobre Parallels es realmente ms rpido que sobre VMware.Por un lado los programas se inician mucho antes y durante el uso del mismo su agilidad es mucho mayor, punto a parte se lleva el tema de 3D, el cual funciona algo mejor en VMware, aunque los cambios son prcticamente insignificantes en algunos programas concretos. “First of all, let me say that I think either Parallels Desktop or VMWare Fusion are excellent choices for virtualizing Windows. “There are two prominent commercial packages to help you with that: VMWare Fusion and Parallels Desktop.”
If that’s the case for you, installing Windows on your Mac could be your best solution,” Cohen writes. “Sometimes equivalent software isn’t available - and even if it is, files aren’t fully compatible with those Mac versions - and sometimes employer IT departments are reluctant to support the Mac. (or simply Citrix) is a Florida-based, multinational corporation specializing in virtualization, cloud computing, and networking technologies.
Learn about Citrix and VMware Citrix Systems, Inc.
“Transitioning from a Windows PC to a Mac can be challenging, especially if you use applications or workflows that are dependent on Windows,” Peter Cohen writes for iMore. Find out more about Citrix vs VMware desktop virtualization solutions in this post.
0 kommentar(er)
